Instead of just outright deciding what should stay and what should go, i decided to make a poll about it to see a general consensus on what should be kept on, or removed from, the disadvantage/advantages of weapon pages, as a response to This Blog. Although i do indeed agree with 1 and 3 (stating decent clip size or the irrelevant 'dosn't make runners explode on kill') i do however strongly disagree with 2, removing the fact that a weapon has a pre-installed polarity from the advantages. i will also add a couple more of my own change suggestions but remember, this is simply to get a general consensus on the matter and does not mean it will necessarily change what happens to the new system.
edit: redid the poll, forgot you can only vote for one option, lol. Answering "No" means you want that option to still exist on that section.
Additional: Vote in this optional poll HERE to get a consensus on what is considered a "Decent" status or critical chance, on selected weapon categories. This is also for record purposes and does not refect wiki standard changes.
What 'Advantages' from weapons should be opted out?
What 'Disadvantages' from weapons should be opted out?
when using the same logic as i have noticed on the other blog, since mastery rank requirements, requiring large amounts of resources or forma, or clan research requirements don't affect the actual weapon, they shouldn't be disadvantages. And as i said, i agreed with most of the blog i linked this one too, i simply wanted to take a different approach by asking user opinion instead of simply deciding what should or shouldn't be put in these sections. feel free to disagree below but please vote so we can get a better consensus on the issue.